Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It seems like you can't read a legal publication these days without coming across an article about a judge in hot water. For instance, in September, it was reported that “[a] West Virginia Supreme Court justice has refused to take himself out of a case involving the state cap on punitive damages, even though he pledged during his election campaign that he would never vote to overturn the law imposing the cap.” See, “New Recusal Controversy in W.Va. High Court,” The National Law Journal, Sept. 27, 2010. Are these types of incidents simply occurring more often and, therefore, warrant reporting? We don't think so. Rather, we believe that the explosion of information about judges now available online has enabled researchers to uncover indications of possible bias, prejudice and other relevant tidbits. For instance, with respect to the above-noted incident, the justice's comments are easily found via a search online (and, notably, the justice ultimately did recuse himself. See, “Ketchum reverses course, recuses himself,” West Virginia Record, Sept. 28, 2010).
When it comes to researching information about a judge, several questions should come to mind:
Answers to these questions can sometimes play a critical role in how a litigator represents his or her client, but real research has to be performed. How to do it? Gone are the days when we could simply send a note to colleagues and local counsel inquiring as to their knowledge about, and experience before, an unknown judge ' and be done with it. Yes, their personal contact and knowledge is of critical importance, but in today's world, with so much information now available online, a litigator must do more.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.