Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The law firm King & Spalding has sued Vivendi S.A. over the alleged failure to pay legal fees billed for the defense of Vivendi's ex-CEO in a securities class-action trial that resulted in a jury verdict against the Paris-based telecommunication and entertainment company. In a lawsuit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, King & Spalding claims that Vivendi didn't pay nearly $866,000 in fees billed for the defense of Jean-Marie Messier, the former Vivendi CEO, who was cleared of liability at the 2010 securities trial. King & Spalding, which continues to represent Messier post-trial and in other lawsuits, seeks damages for those fees and an order directing Vivendi to pay all of Messier's fees going forward. King & Spalding LLP v. Vivendi S.A., 10116232.
A spokesperson for Vivendi declined comment. Michael J. Malone, Messier's lawyer at King & Spalding and the one who filed the suit, didn't return a call seeking comment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?