Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sea Launch Company, LLC (“Sea Launch”), through its affiliates, provided a unique service ' the launching of heavy commercial satellites (4,000-6,000 kg) from a floating platform on the equator in the Pacific Ocean. Like something from a James Bond movie, Sea Launch is a relic of the Cold War ' a joint venture formed by Boeing, a Russian rocket manufacturer (RSC Energia), two Ukrainian rocket manufacturers (Yuzhnoye and Yuzhmash), and a Norwegian ship-building company (Aker). With encouragement from the U.S. government in the hope that a commercial rocket program would employ Russian (and Ukranian) rocket scientists (reducing the likelihood of proliferation to Iran, North Korea and other less savory jurisdictions), the program sought to achieve geosynchronous orbit (at approximately 22,000 miles above the Earth) in the most cost-effective and fuel-efficient manner possible. Sea Launch, conceived in the early 1990s and established in 1995, achieved 27 successful sea-based launches from 1999 to 2009.
Sea Launch's international ownership and unique capital structure (almost exclusively “partner debt”) and business model (utilizing a series of treaties between the United States, Russia and the Ukraine) engendered a unique reorganization process in that, although the debt was well in excess of $2.5 billion, Sea Launch had less than 150 creditors. The creditors included the contingent, unliquidated claims of customers in connection with future launches, necessitating separate negotiations with each customer as a part of the reorganization, and a unique and perverse tax issue arose at the end of the reorganization that could have required Sea Launch to withhold significant sums in respect of cancellation of indebtedness income due to a rarely invoked provision of the Tax Code.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.