Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since 1980, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) has emerged as an increasingly popular mechanism for foreign claimants to bring suit in U.S. courts for alleged human rights violations committed abroad. While some courts restrict ATS jurisdiction to suits against state actors (see Saleh v. Titan Corp., 580 F.3d 1, 14 (D.C. Cir. 2009)), other courts have permitted ATS claims to proceed against private individuals and corporations, often under theories of secondary liability such as aiding and abetting a foreign government's violation of international law. Although numerous claims against corporate entities have been dismissed on jurisdictional and other grounds, the issue of whether the ATS can impose liability against corporations and other juridical entities rarely has been addressed by the appellate courts. Recent decisions from the Second Circuit, rejecting corporate liability under the ATS and imposing high standards for successful aiding and abetting claims, provide a fresh look at ATS claims involving corporate actors, with potentially broad implications for this area of litigation.
Background: The ATS and the Supreme Court's Decision in Sosa
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.