Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bankruptcy practitioners are all well aware that one of the key fundamental principles underlying any bankruptcy case is the maximization of estate value for the benefit of each of a debtor's creditor constituents. Debtors will often attempt to achieve such value maximization through a sale of its assets. But what happens to the sale process ' usually conducted pursuant to very strict, court approved bidding procedures and protections ' if another bidder rides its white horse into the limelight after the 11th hour expressing its willingness and ability to pay more for the assets? Unless and until this issue is resolved by the United States Supreme Court, the answer may very well depend upon which bankruptcy court is overseeing the sale process in question. This article highlights the tension courts face between recognizing the finality of a sale and reopening a sale process if potentially greater value for the creditors exists, and compares how bankruptcy courts in the Southern District of New York and in Delaware have addressed the issue.
The Auction Process
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.