Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistLJN NewslettersNewsSections

A Failure to Assume

By By Bruce Buechler
February 27, 2011

In most Chapter 11 cases, the debtor (or trustee if one is appointed), either prior to or in connection with plan confirmation, will move to assume or reject its executory contracts, unexpired leases, or both (collectively “executory contracts”) pursuant to ' 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. This article discusses the “ride-through” doctrine, which courts have developed to resolve the ambiguity resulting from a debtor's failure to assume or reject an executory contract under ' 365 prior to plan confirmation. Under this doctrine, “executory contracts that are neither affirmatively assumed or rejected by the debtor under ' 365, pass through bankruptcy unaffected.” In re Hernandez, 287 B.R. 795, 799 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2002); see also In re Polysat, Inc., 152 B.R. 886, 890 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1993).

This article does not deal with leases of non-residential real property, because the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) amended ' 365(d)(4) and imposed an outside limit of 210 days for a debtor-lessee to assume or reject a prepetition lease of non-residential real estate. Thus, under amended ' 365(d)(4), a non-residential real estate lease where the debtor is the lessee is deemed rejected if the debtor has neither assumed nor rejected it: 1) within 120 days of the bankruptcy filing, subject to one 90-day nonconsensual extension by court order (additional extensions require the lessor's consent); or 2) before plan confirmation, whichever is earlier. Accordingly, non-residential leases can no longer ride through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.