Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: On Feb. 7, American Medical Response of Connecticut settled the case mentioned in this article. Under the agreement, which was reached one day before a hearing by an administrative law judge was scheduled to begin, American Medical (AM) agreed to revise its “overly broad” social media policies. The employee, Dawnmarie Souza, settled privately with AM. The main issue of the case, i.e., whether employee discussions on
Facebook constitutes concerted activity under labor laws, was not addressed in the settlement. The case remains an important one as a cautionary warning to employers to tread carefully before firing employees for their social media activities.
Your employee is angry with her supervisor and posts a scathing rant on Facebook. Another employee is frustrated with her bonuses and starts an online group for fellow employees to complain about the company's compensation practices. Still another posts photos of himself wearing a hat with the company logo while drinking in a bar. How does the employer manage the online actions of its employees?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.