Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Uncertainty in Admissibility of Comparative Product Evidence Under CA Law
In Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Company (2006) 141 Cal.App.525 [Buell-Wilson (I)], the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, held that, in a strict automotive product liability case, a “manufacturer cannot defend a product liability action with evidence it met its industry's customs or standards on safety.” In particular, the court of appeal opinion categorically precludes a manufacturer from proving by statistical evidence that its vehicle performs more safely than its peers, concluding that statistical comparative-safety evidence is inadmissible industry custom and practice.
While Buell-Wilson (I) deals with exclusion of comparative rollover data for automobiles in California, the case is being cited by other jurisdictions, for other products, as a wholesale prohibition against the introduction of any comparative data or any industry customs or standards. Buell-Wilson (I)'s continued precedential viability is in doubt, but that does not stop plaintiffs in product liability actions from basing exclusionary motions upon it, seeking exclusion of highly relevant evidence, such as: compliance with federal regulations (i.e., FMVSS); state of the art at the time of manufacture; non-statistical comparative performance evidence; general comparative injury evidence; compliance with company practices or standards in the industry; comparative statistics; any comparison to other products; and any analysis of how safely other vehicles produced by other manufacturers perform in comparison.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.