Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Corporate leaders successfully steered their businesses through one of the worst recessions in history in large measure by directing their focus on the performance and spending of all supporting departments, including their corporate legal departments. This focus has resulted in General Counsel re-examining every aspect of their department's operations. As a consequence, the law firms that serve these corporations are under intense pressure to deliver the same quality of work product at a sharply reduced rate. General Counsel have sought to implement these spend reductions through the use of Alternative Fee Arrangements (AFAs) with their firms, which are often agreements to perform work at essentially a fixed fee. However, given that firms have historically operated under a billable hour model, they require a new approach to delivering legal services that enables them to maintain high quality while becoming as efficient as possible.
Efficiency, in large measure, depends on much closer collaboration between the parties. The good news for them is that principles already proven in business- and operations-management disciplines are available to address their respective challenges: Project management. Project management (PM) processes were originally designed to manage very large endeavors (such as the Apollo program) but over time have been refined for use in nearly every capacity. Over the past five years, I have noticed a steadily growing interest by commentators in applying PM principles to the legal profession, often when e-discovery is involved. This interest is also becoming apparent when I attend legal conferences and, if it continues, points to an important change in how legal operations will be carried out. One thing is for certain: Project management applications for legal operations ' legal project management or LPM ' hold promise for transforming the relationship between General Counsel and outside counsel because it combines a closer working relationship between their respective teams with a high degree of transparency and accountability for every action taken.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.