Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc.

On Feb. 15, 2011, Chancellor William B. Chandler III of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued his ruling in the epic takeover battle between Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. and Airgas, Inc. The case posed the fundamental question regarding the allocation of power between directors and stockholders in a hostile tender offer: Who gets to decide when and if the corporation is for sale? More specifically, as framed by Chancellor Chandler, when faced with a structurally non-coercive, all-cash, fully-financed tender offer directed to the stockholders of the corporation, may a board of directors, acting in good faith and with a reasonable basis for its decision, keep a poison pill in place so as to prevent stockholders from making their own decision about whether they want to tender their shares, even if the stockholders are fully informed as to the board's views on the inadequacy of the offer? On the facts before it, the court concluded that the Airgas board could maintain its poison pill, effectively denying stockholders the right to vote on the Air Products offer, because the Airgas board had met its Unocal burden (Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 (Del. 1985)) to articulate a legally cognizable threat posed by the offer, and the retention of the pill by the board fell within a range of reasonableness proportionate to the threat. In its analysis, the court found that the likelihood that a majority of Airgas stockholders would tender into an offer the board judged inadequate constituted a legally cognizable threat, and that the retention of the pill in the face of the threat was a proportionately reasonable response. The setting of corporate goals and the timeframe for achieving those goals remain squarely the responsibility of the board and may not be delegated to stockholders. Until further pronouncement by the Supreme Court of Delaware, the power to defeat an inadequate hostile tender offer lies with the board of directors and its judgment to maintain its poison pill.

Background

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.