Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Decision of Note</b> Film Owner Can't Claim Copyright Protection for Actor's Multiple Roles

To determine whether a defendant's work is substantially similar to a plaintiff's work in a copyright infringement case, courts generally first discard any unprotectable elements from the plaintiff's work. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently ruled that the use of one actor to play multiple roles in the plaintiff's 1949 comedy film Kind Hearts and Coronets wasn't a protectable element for proving infringement by the authors of a stage musical adapted from the film. Canal+Image UK Ltd. v. Lutvak, 10 Civ. 1536. The movie was drawn from the novel Israel Rank, which is now in the public domain. In 2003, film owner Canal+ granted Steven Lutvak and Robert L. Freedman “the exclusive authorization, to the extent of the interests of [Canal+] ' to adapt the Film ' as a live stage musical presentation.” Lutvak and Freedman then developed A Gentleman's Guide to Love and Murder. But Canal+ exercised its right to terminate the adaptation agreement by deciding not to proceed with the musical. When the authors nevertheless continued with the production, Canal+ filed suit, alleging that Lutvak and Freedman “have retained the style and occurrence of humorous, non-realistic deaths from the Film, deaths which are very different from the horrifyingly realistic ways in which the victims die in Israel Rank.” The complaint also alleged that “defendants' retitled musical has retained the central and most memorable expressive part of Kind Hearts and Coronets: the comedy inherent in having all eight of the aristocratic murder victims played by a single actor [i.e., Alec Guinness in the movie].”

Granting the defendants' motion to dismiss, District Judge Richard J. Howell found that the film's “comedic adaption of the Novel is not protectable” and that the “setting is not protectible [sic] not only because it is historical but because it is also the setting of the Novel.” Judge Howell further noted: “Both works use one actor to play multiple roles, but under the discerning observer test, that device is not protectible. And however protectible a combination of elements might be under the total concept and feel test [for determining substantial similarity], the works do not have a similar feel. Canal+ would have the Court apply a kind of intermediate test that examines not the elements alone or the works in their entirety but only one aspect of those works: how the decision to portray characters in a story interacts with that story. At bottom, however, that inquiry merely asks how parts have been acted. As applied here, that amounts to an argument that Sir Alec Guinness's tour de force is protectible. But it is no more protectible than Charles Laughton's Henry VIII or Sir Laurence Olivier's Hamlet.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.