Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Federal District Court Applies Supreme Court's 'Nerve Center' Test

By Robert S. Reder, David S. Schwartz and Brian P. Murphy

Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court resolved a conflict among the federal circuits by establishing a uniform interpretation of the phrase “principal place of business” for determining corporate citizenship under 28 U.S.C. ' 1332(a), the federal diversity jurisdiction statute (the “Diversity Statute”). In Hertz Corp. v. Friend (130 S.Ct. 1181 (Feb. 23, 2010)), the Supreme Court ruled that corporate citizenship should be determined on the basis of the specific location of a corporation's “center of direction, control, and coordination” ' usually, but not always, the state in which its principal headquarters is located. This methodology is aptly labeled the “nerve center” test. To avoid potential “attempts at manipulation,” the Hertz Court explained that a nominal principal office consisting of “nothing more than a mail drop box, a bare office with a computer, or the location of an annual executive retreat” will not suffice to establish a corporation's nerve center.

Recently, in Brewer et al. v. SmithKline Beacham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (Civ. Action No. 10-4443 et seq. (E.D. Pa., March 24, 2011)), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania applied Hertz in deciding the citizenship, for purposes of the Diversity Statute, of an operating entity organized as a limited liability company (“LLC”) within a corporate holding company structure. In a fact-specific ruling, the district court found that “for purposes of determining the citizenship of a limited liability company whose sole member is a holding company that does not direct or control the operations of the limited liability company, we look to the 'nerve center' of the limited liability company to which the holding company has delegated the operational decision-making.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.