Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In what may be the final chapter in the years of litigation over tax-exempt entity leasing transactions, the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Federal Claims Court's decision disallowing Wells Fargo's deductions from SILO transactions. Wells Fargo & Company v. United States, Fed. Cir. 2010-5108 (April 15, 2011). For your recollection, in a sale-in, lease-out (“SILO”) transaction the tax-exempt entity sells an asset it owns to the taxpayer. The taxpayer leases the asset back to the tax-exempt entity for a term less than the asset's remaining useful life. The lease is a net lease, meaning that the tax-exempt entity is responsible for all expenses normally associated with ownership of the asset. (In lieu of a sale, the tax-exempt entity may retain legal title to the asset and sell the property (for tax purposes) via a head lease for a term extending beyond the remaining useful life of the asset.)
The taxpayer funds the asset purchase price in part with its own funds and in part with a nonrecourse loan. The lessee places 95% of the proceeds in two cash collateral accounts, one for the taxpayer's equity portion and one for the debt portion. Each account generates investment income and sufficient cash to fund the lessee's rent payment obligations, which fund the lessor's debt service on the debt. The payment obligations are economically “defeased” ' dedicated funds are set aside for the purpose of paying the obligations.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.