Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For many years, it's been assumed that when franchisors and franchisees are locked in an unsolvable dispute, franchisors prefer arbitration to courtroom litigation. Mandatory arbitration clauses have become standard-issue in franchise contracts, and, most likely, they have stifled a fair amount of courtroom action. Franchisors, and businesses generally, have found mandatory arbitration in class action litigation to be valuable.
However, litigation about whether mandatory arbitration clauses do, indeed, require arbitration seems to be a growth industry. Most recently, the U.S. Supreme Court, in ATT Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. __ (2011), upheld a mandatory arbitration clause in a consumer class action. The decision was widely viewed as a significant win for the business community.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.