Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Marvel's Win over Kirby Estate

By Jan Wolfe
August 29, 2011

It's been a good stretch for Marvel Entertainment and its former president Stan Lee, the ever-youthful 87-year old face of the company. Marvel characters Thor and Captain America have dominated the box office. Lee keeps winning over young fans with his blink-and-you'll-miss-them film cameos. (Look closely for him as a truck driver trying to dislodge Thor's hammer in Thor or as a general at an award ceremony in Captain America: The First Avenger). Now, thanks to a Stan Lee role on the witness stand, Marvel and its parent The Walt Disney Co. were able claim a win in the courtroom.

District Judge Colleen McMahon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently granted summary judgment to Marvel and its league of lawyers at Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Haynes and Boone and Weil, Gotshal & Manges, in the declaratory copyright case brought against Marvel by the estate of comic book legend Jack Kirby. McMahon ruled that Kirby's heirs could not claim rights to valuable characters he created for Marvel, like Spiderman, X-Men and the Incredible Hulk. Marvel Worldwide Inc. v. Kirby, 10 Civ. 141. The Paul Hastings team was led by Jodi Kleinick. James Quinn, Randi Singer and R. Bruce Rich represented Marvel at Weil, and David Fleischer at Haynes and Boone worked on the case.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.