Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Why are 99.69% of all clients regularly ignored? Most law firm marketing focuses on a tiny slice of the market, on companies with 500 or more employees. Yet, these large companies comprise a mere 0.31% of all companies in the U.S.: that is 18,469 companies compared with 5,911,663 potential clients, according to the latest released statistics.
Often overlooked, small and medium-sized companies have great economic impact. They employ 49.37% of all employees and generate 43.45% of payroll in the U.S. Their legal needs are the economic “bread and butter” for many law firms. Few law firms, however, have dedicated marketing and business development strategies to target small or medium-sized companies.
The Conflict
Through law firm mergers, today's firms are increasingly conflicted when working with large companies. Larger in-house legal departments mean that less work goes to outside counsel. Large companies were also the first to embrace Legal Process Outsourcing (LPO) as an alternative for low-stakes work. In an ever more competitive marketplace, law firms today no longer only compete with other law firms, but also with other professional service providers as well as associations, banks and insurance companies, for example. In addition, a range of online and offline programs and systems are available to clients at a much lower price, reducing the amount of legal advice bought from traditional law firms.
This situation is much less bleak with medium-sized companies. Most don't have in-house lawyers and they don't usually turn to Legal Process Outsourcing firms. There are a number of other ways in which they distinguish themselves from larger companies.
Medium vs. Large Businesses
To develop a competitive edge essential for long-term success, law firms need to thoroughly understand the decision-making process of medium-sized companies when buying legal services. For starters, while law firms and lawyers often emphasize the aspect of tailored solutions, medium-sized companies place little emphasis on it. They welcome the idea of more efficiency in the provision of legal services, which they see as a consequence of commoditization with cost savings being passed on to clients.
1. Packaged legal solutions make business sense for decision-makers in medium-sized companies, and medium-sized companies are content with the type and depth of information they purchase, particularly considering the lower price.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.