Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

John Wiley & Sons v. Kirtsaeng

By Matthew Siegal and Binni Shah

In John Wiley & Sons Inc., v. Kirtsaeng, __ F.3d __, 2011 WL 3560003 (2d Cir. Aug. 15, 2011), the Second Circuit took a stand against parallel importation of copyrighted works made under the authority of the U.S. copyright owner in a foreign country. In doing so, it aligned itself with the Ninth Circuit in Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008), aff'd 131 S. Ct. 565 (2010) and four of the eight Supreme Court Justices ruling on Costco's appeal. Justice Elena Kagan had recused herself, having opposed Costco's petition for certiorari when still in the Justice Department.

At issue in Wiley was an interpretation of what it means for a work to have been “lawfully made under” the Copyright Act. For some, the answer is simple. They believe it means that the work must be made in the United States, noting that the Act has no extra-territorial effect. Others counter that it means made anywhere, as long as it is made by the U.S. copyright owner, reasoning that lawfully made under the Act means not unlawfully made under the Act. For some, the issue seems to turn on whether they believe that the answer will affect where U.S. book publishers make their books. In any event, unless this case makes it to the Supreme Court, the Ninth and Second Circuits have now spoken on this issue and supported the use of copyright law to combat parallel imports.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.