Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's world of federal regulation, businesses constantly submit documents and information to the government. Whether it is financial information to the SEC, testing data to the FDA, pricing and inspection data to agencies contracting with businesses for goods and services, or the results of internal investigations to any one of a number of federal investigative agencies, businesses supply the government with information that can provide an intimate look into their inner workings.
Such information can be extremely valuable in product liability litigation, and indeed often can determine the outcome of a case. The more information a litigant has, the stronger its case will likely be. Consequently, plaintiffs are constantly looking for ways to obtain information both directly from corporate defendants and indirectly from other sources. Conversely, the better a business can control a plaintiff's access to information, the greater its opportunity to control and limit the scope of litigation. As such, companies must carefully consider what information they submit to the government and how they can limit what portion of that information is later released to the public. This has become increasingly difficult as the use by private litigants of the federal Freedom of Information Act has expanded and access to government documents has become increasingly easy. Further, a recent Supreme Court decision has reinforced the need for businesses to tread carefully in this potentially dangerous battleground.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.