Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While insureds often seek liability coverage for damages arising from bodily injury or property damage, an increasing number of insureds are seeking coverage for “advertising injury” in an age of growing technology and intellectual property disputes. Coverage for “advertising injury,” generally found in Part B of a commercial liability policy, insures against injuries that occur in the “course of advertising [the insured's] goods, products or services.” “Advertising injury” is defined to include injury arising from a specific, finite category of offenses, including:
Lawsuits implicating advertising injury often involve claims of defamation, patent, trademark and copyright infringement, and violation of privacy torts. Under the threshold requirements to coverage, the insured's alleged conduct, in addition to falling within an enumerated offense, must have occurred within the course of “advertising.” Recent decisions confirm that whether an insured is “advertising” depends strongly on the nature of the insured's communication, and the identity of the insured's targeted audience.
The Majority of Courts Define 'Advertising' in Terms of Public Dissemination
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.