Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At one time in the not-too-distant past, “bad boy” guaranties provided additional protection to lenders in the event of serious malfeasance by borrowers or guarantors, such as fraud or misappropriation of funds. But with the explosive growth of non-recourse finance transactions in the past decade, particularly in the real estate area, lenders began to expand the scope of those guaranties to include as “bad acts,” among other actions, voluntary bankruptcy filings by borrowers. Once the economy soured, therefore, distressed borrowers and guarantors found themselves with a dilemma: forego using bankruptcy to effect an orderly restructuring or reorganization of borrower indebtedness or find yourself liable for hundreds of millions of dollars of formerly non-recourse debt. This sounds like a quandary that would make even a bad boy cry.
Not surprisingly, these previously non-contentious guaranties have emerged as a fertile source of conflict between lenders and borrowers and have become the subject of several judicial challenges. Here, we discuss two recent New York decisions: UBS Commercial Mortg. Trust 2007-FL1 v. Garrison Special Opportunities Fund L.P., No. 652412/10, 2011 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4490 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. March 8, 2011) and Bank of Am. v. Lightstone Holdings, LLC, No. 601853/09, 2011 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4412 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. July 14, 2011), both of which enforce the “bad boy” guaranties at issue.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.