Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Insurance Policy Doesn't Cover Artists Suit Against Record Company
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, found that an insurance company wasn't obligated to defend an insured record company in a lawsuit filed against the label by one of its recording artists. The Oglio Entertainment Group Inc. v. The Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., B224156. Comic lounge singer Richard Cheese (a.k.a., Richard Davis) had sued Oglio over an offer of a low advance on a second album and for then hiring other artists to record in his style. Hartford refused to defend Oglio under an insurance policy the record company had with Hartford. Oglio and Cheese later settled their case, and Oglio sued Hartford. The insurance policy covers certain types of advertising injury claims. The court of appeal noted: “The policy language defines advertising injury as an injury arising out of '[c]opying, in your 'advertisement,' a person's or organizations 'advertising idea' or style of 'advertisement.' Davis's complaint alleged that Oglio sought out other recording artists to record lounge-style versions of popular songs, and released the Competing Albums by Bud E. Luv and Jaymz Bee & The Deep Lounge Coalition while the recording agreement was in effect ' diverting sales away from Davis's album and reducing the value of Davis's professional name, Richard Cheese. This does not allege that Oglio copied, in an advertisement, Davis's advertising idea or style of advertisement ' [T]he policy defines advertisement as the widespread dissemination of information or images with the purpose of selling a product, and the complaint alleged that Oglio copied Davis's product.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.