Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Medical payments (“med pay”) coverage is a part of many commercial premises liability policies. Typically, med pay covers reasonable medical expenses, regardless of fault, up to a specified limit (usually between $1,000 and $10,000) if someone is hurt on the policyholder's premises.
Med pay coverage is usually purchased for good will purposes. It is hoped that if an injured person's medical expenses are paid, it will deter the injured person from instituting a lawsuit. To illustrate: Suppose a customer slips and falls while shopping at a store and incurs medical expenses. Because med pay coverage is applicable regardless of fault, the store can arrange for its customer's medical expenses to be paid under the med pay provisions in the store's liability policy. This way, through its show of good will, the store can avoid an acrimonious exchange with the customer ' or a lawsuit ' concerning whether the slip and fall was the store's fault.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.