Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although state corporation law bestows upon shareholders the right to nominate candidates for election as directors, and then to vote their shares in director elections, it is the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that regulates the all-important proxy solicitation process by which shareholders of publicly traded corporations exercise their voting rights. In fact, according to the SEC, proxy regulation was one of the original tasks with which the SEC was charged by Congress at the time of the adoption of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Today, reform of the proxy solicitation process is one of the “hot-button” issues for advocates of enhanced rights for shareholders of publicly traded corporations.
On several occasions during recent years, the SEC has sought to amend its proxy rules to provide shareholders with access to company proxy materials for the purpose of nominating individuals for election as directors in opposition to management-backed candidates. The SEC has been motivated by its concern that the Federal proxy rules may not enable shareholders to exercise fully their state law rights to nominate director candidates. Under current SEC rules, shareholders who wish to nominate director candidates in opposition to incumbent directors must clear with the SEC and distribute to shareholders proxy materials in support of their candidates. Although web-based solicitations have made this process somewhat more shareholder-friendly, running a proxy contest remains a relatively complicated, time-consuming and expensive undertaking, pursued for the most part only in connection with hostile takeover bids or by well-heeled, motivated investors. At least a majority of the current SEC Commissioners believes that the inability of shareholders to access company materials to nominate opposition candidates gives a real advantage to incumbent directors and represents a “failure of the proxy process” that has negatively impacted the state law right of shareholders to nominate and elect directors.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.