Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The sun has set on the collective Sunrise periods in the race to acquire .XXX domain names. Sun-up on Nov. 8, however, shed new light on a seemingly boundless landscape of .XXX domain name possibilities. The dawn of the wild, wild West of .XXX domain name acquisition, a trail first blazed by a red light Landrush between Nov. 8 and Nov. 25, where the sole prerequisite for Applicants was a membership in the adult Sponsored Community (namely, individuals, companies and organizations who “provide talent, products or services to the adult industry”) (www.icmregistry.com/about/). Demonstrated members were not required to be trademark owners or exhibit pre-existing ownership rights ' or even be first in line for the domain (www.icmregistry.com/launch/plan/#landrush_rules). While domains with lone Applicants were set to be automatically allocated at the close of Landrush, unlike the prior periods in the launch, competing Applicants participated in a closed auction at the end of the period.
As the dust settles following the Nov. 25, 2011 close of Landrush, however, the last (and potentially most contentious) leg of the launch commenced. General availability began on Dec. 6, and .XXX domains are being allocated on a first come basis ' no requirements for pre-existing rights or adult community memberships apply (www.icmregistry.com/launch/plan/#general_aval). Now is the time for trademark, domain name and brand owners to purchase .XXX domains to pro-actively race to stake a claim in their brand ' if only as a defensive measure to prevent other domain owners from registering/using their name in a .XXX context. It's a showdown at the .XXX corral.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.