Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many times a policyholder-employer can predict the potential for an employment-related claim long before that claim materializes into formal litigation. An employee, for example, may complain to a supervisor about an unlawful employment practice. She then may submit a written complaint to human resources. If that complaint does not get resolved to her satisfaction, the employee may file a complaint with an administrative agency, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), or have her attorney send a letter to the policyholder-employer. After exhausting her administrative remedies, the employee may file a lawsuit.
Employers insure against losses arising from certain employment-related claims by obtaining employment practices liability insurance (“EPLI”) policies. Critical to those policyholder-employers is the question of at what stage of the process, described above, must the insurers be placed on notice. The failure to give timely and proper notice, under certain circumstances, could result in the forfeiture of coverage. As will be explained below, the answer to this question often is controlled by the policy's definition of a “claim.” The definition, however, varies among different EPLI policies. In addition, the specific content of an employee's complaint can affect the answer. This article analyzes different trends in the law concerning what constitutes a “claim” for purposes of an EPLI policy.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?