Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Many times a policyholder-employer can predict the potential for an employment-related claim long before that claim materializes into formal litigation. An employee, for example, may complain to a supervisor about an unlawful employment practice. She then may submit a written complaint to human resources. If that complaint does not get resolved to her satisfaction, the employee may file a complaint with an administrative agency, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), or have her attorney send a letter to the policyholder-employer. After exhausting her administrative remedies, the employee may file a lawsuit.
Employers insure against losses arising from certain employment-related claims by obtaining employment practices liability insurance (“EPLI”) policies. Critical to those policyholder-employers is the question of at what stage of the process, described above, must the insurers be placed on notice. The failure to give timely and proper notice, under certain circumstances, could result in the forfeiture of coverage. As will be explained below, the answer to this question often is controlled by the policy's definition of a “claim.” The definition, however, varies among different EPLI policies. In addition, the specific content of an employee's complaint can affect the answer. This article analyzes different trends in the law concerning what constitutes a “claim” for purposes of an EPLI policy.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.