Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Large corporate Chapter 11 debtors often realize value by divesting assets under ' 363 of the Bankruptcy Code as part of their development and negotiation of a Chapter 11 plan pursuant to which the proceeds of such sales will be distributed. When a debtor's ability to propose a plan of reorganization outpaces its sale efforts, there may be pressure to confirm the plan before the asset sales are completed. In such circumstances, bankruptcy courts have preserved the debtor's ability to dispose of assets pursuant to ' 363 of the Bankruptcy Code following confirmation and even the effectiveness of a Chapter 11 plan.
It is easy to understand why debtors and purchasers would want to preserve the estate's ability to sell assets pursuant to ' 363 following confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan. Section 363 offers numerous benefits that are attractive to debtors and purchasers. Under ' 363(f), assets can be sold free and clear of interests ' presumably including interests existing as of the date of the order approving the sale or the closing of the sale. Appeals of orders authorizing the good-faith sale of property may be mooted under ' 363(m). And the time required to complete a sale pursuant to ' 363 could be significantly shorter than the time required to solicit a plan, which otherwise could be required if the assets to be sold are material to plan recoveries. In some instances, the debtor may even be able to obtain an injunction prohibiting creditors from pursuing claims related to the assets against the purchaser.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.