Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Laterals: Dangers and Opportunities

By Allan Colman
January 31, 2012

So much for organic growth! An astounding 48% of new partners have changed firms before becoming partner, according to a 2011 ALM Intelligence survey. Two reasons disclosed in the report stand out. One was the opportunity for business development training at the law firms hiring these lawyers. The other highly rated motivation for “lateraling” was that the new firm required a 360-degree review of performance.

In other words, these lawyers want to be evaluated based on their ability to develop business.

Fair Is Fair

Non-partner attorneys recognize that, under most conditions but certainly in this marketplace, high-quality legal work is not and should not be enough for promotion. Meeting their billing hour requirements is likewise expected. And yet I continue to hear from senior associates and newer partners that their firms do not “tell me where I stand.” Absent both training and feedback, it's only to be expected that they'll look elsewhere for the bona-fide career development opportunities that they're going to need in order to succeed anywhere.

It is a long-observable trend that revenue-hungry law firms tilt toward recruiting laterals rather than first-years. They naturally target senior associates and junior partners with highly prized legal skills who can take on an assignment immediately. So it's no surprise to see that 88% of the new partners surveyed by ALM rank their ability to perform “first-class” legal work as important to becoming partners. Again, though, these lawyers are likely aware that such skills are only the table stakes.

More strategically critical as a recruitment and retention determinant, 44% cited the ability to pursue and engage new clients. Here's the cusp where laterals take on added value for the firms that hire them. These lawyers are, not only hungry to become better business developers, but often sufficiently committed to the sales process to have already built relationships with past and current clients. Portable relationships.

So voil', they have something tangible to bring to their new firms as well as an eagerness to learn more about how to enlarge that dowry after the nuptials. The 2011 Acritas Law Firm and Client Relationship Survey provides important insight in this context. Of the in-house lawyers who responded to the question, “Why have you started using a new firm in the last six months,” 9% said they had followed a lateral.

What law firms must know ' and the opportunistic hiring by some firms proves that they do indeed already know it ' is that these laterals are not all partners. The fact that some of those lawyers are associates looking for a better home to nourish their burgeoning business development skills strongly suggests that even more lateral movement is in the offing. Associates aren't fools, especially not in this economy.

Invest!

The message for law firms is to invest. Invest in your senior associates and junior partners by providing ongoing business development training and mentoring. If their performances require tweaking, so be it. If you've hired away talent from competitors who have fallen short in terms of these training and evaluation imperatives, seize the opportunity and make good on the very career development promise that attracted them to you in the first place. Don't stop with senior associates, of course, but also bear in mind that your new partners are vulnerable to raids from your competitors.

Conclusion

Once upon a time, but not so long ago, the defection of younger lawyers threatened law firms because it meant work interruptions and the perception by clients that your teams were unstable and your deliverables perforce inefficient. These days, those defections also spell more direct potential revenue losses as the business-getters with the most promise walk out the door and don't come back.


Allan Colman is the CEO of the Closers Group, a business development advisory and consulting firm. Contact him at 310-225-3904 or via e-mail at [email protected].

So much for organic growth! An astounding 48% of new partners have changed firms before becoming partner, according to a 2011 ALM Intelligence survey. Two reasons disclosed in the report stand out. One was the opportunity for business development training at the law firms hiring these lawyers. The other highly rated motivation for “lateraling” was that the new firm required a 360-degree review of performance.

In other words, these lawyers want to be evaluated based on their ability to develop business.

Fair Is Fair

Non-partner attorneys recognize that, under most conditions but certainly in this marketplace, high-quality legal work is not and should not be enough for promotion. Meeting their billing hour requirements is likewise expected. And yet I continue to hear from senior associates and newer partners that their firms do not “tell me where I stand.” Absent both training and feedback, it's only to be expected that they'll look elsewhere for the bona-fide career development opportunities that they're going to need in order to succeed anywhere.

It is a long-observable trend that revenue-hungry law firms tilt toward recruiting laterals rather than first-years. They naturally target senior associates and junior partners with highly prized legal skills who can take on an assignment immediately. So it's no surprise to see that 88% of the new partners surveyed by ALM rank their ability to perform “first-class” legal work as important to becoming partners. Again, though, these lawyers are likely aware that such skills are only the table stakes.

More strategically critical as a recruitment and retention determinant, 44% cited the ability to pursue and engage new clients. Here's the cusp where laterals take on added value for the firms that hire them. These lawyers are, not only hungry to become better business developers, but often sufficiently committed to the sales process to have already built relationships with past and current clients. Portable relationships.

So voil', they have something tangible to bring to their new firms as well as an eagerness to learn more about how to enlarge that dowry after the nuptials. The 2011 Acritas Law Firm and Client Relationship Survey provides important insight in this context. Of the in-house lawyers who responded to the question, “Why have you started using a new firm in the last six months,” 9% said they had followed a lateral.

What law firms must know ' and the opportunistic hiring by some firms proves that they do indeed already know it ' is that these laterals are not all partners. The fact that some of those lawyers are associates looking for a better home to nourish their burgeoning business development skills strongly suggests that even more lateral movement is in the offing. Associates aren't fools, especially not in this economy.

Invest!

The message for law firms is to invest. Invest in your senior associates and junior partners by providing ongoing business development training and mentoring. If their performances require tweaking, so be it. If you've hired away talent from competitors who have fallen short in terms of these training and evaluation imperatives, seize the opportunity and make good on the very career development promise that attracted them to you in the first place. Don't stop with senior associates, of course, but also bear in mind that your new partners are vulnerable to raids from your competitors.

Conclusion

Once upon a time, but not so long ago, the defection of younger lawyers threatened law firms because it meant work interruptions and the perception by clients that your teams were unstable and your deliverables perforce inefficient. These days, those defections also spell more direct potential revenue losses as the business-getters with the most promise walk out the door and don't come back.


Allan Colman is the CEO of the Closers Group, a business development advisory and consulting firm. Contact him at 310-225-3904 or via e-mail at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.