Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Practice Tip: Product Liability Litigation
Abraham Lincoln once wrote, “Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can '” Sage advice from one of our most esteemed leaders. Honest Abe talks about persuading one's neighbors to compromise, but what he fails to mention is how much we can actually learn from our neighbors when it comes to discouraging litigation and forging compromise. This is especially true in the world of product liability.
Product liability litigation in the United States exploded between 1975 and 1997. “In less than a quarter century, the annual number of [product liability] cases filed in federal courts alone rose from 2,393 to 32,856.” Mathias Reimann, Liability for Defective Products at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century: Emergence of a Worldwide Standard, 51 Am. J. Comp. L. 751, 803 (2003). In the wake of this drastic increase, our legislative bodies and courts implemented varying degrees of tort reform. In 2003, probably in part due to this reform, the number of product liability cases filed in federal court had fallen to approximately 15,000 cases per year. Id. Approximately another 15,000 cases were filed in state court, making the total number of product liability cases filed in 2003 nearly 30,000. Id. This is approximately one product liability case for every 9,000 US inhabitants. Id.
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.