Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Use of the Travel Act to Prosecute Foreign Commercial Bribery

By Paul R. Berger, Bruce E. Yannett and David M. Fuhr
February 27, 2012

On Sept. 20, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California denied another round of defense motions in United States v. Carson, a case arising out of alleged bribes paid or authorized by employees of Control Components Inc. (CCI), a California manufacturer of control valves that pleaded guilty to FCPA violations in 2009. See DOJ Press Rel. No. 09-754, Control Components Inc. Pleads Guilty to Foreign Bribery Charges and Agrees to Pay $18.2 Million Criminal Fine (July 31, 2009), www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/July/09-crm-754.html. The latest motions had challenged the government's indictments under the Travel Act. The court also denied motions that contended that California's commercial bribery statute does not reach defendants' conduct, that the relevant statutes invoked in the indictment are unconstitutionally vague, and that several of the government's counts are defective because they omitted allegations pertaining to essential elements of the Travel Act.

The Carson case, which is not scheduled to go to trial until mid-2012, has already featured several challenges to the U.S. government's prosecution of foreign bribery. The Travel Act motion comes on the heels of the defendants' objection to the government's interpretation of the term “foreign official” in the FCPA. Previously, the district court had rejected the defendants challenge based on the definition of “foreign official” that asserted that payments to employees of state instrumentalities that do not perform traditional government functions are not encompassed by the FCPA, and that specific individuals employed by a Mexican state-owned public utility Comisi'n Federal de Electricidad did not fall within the parameters of this definition. See Sean Hecker, Philip Rohlik & Michael A. Janson, Carson Ruling on Defendants' Challenge to the DOJ's Definition of “Foreign Official”: A Fact-Based Approach, FCPA Update, Vol. 2, No. 10 (May 2011). For further coverage on Carson, see Sean Hecker, Bruce E. Yannett & Michael A. Janson, Defendants Contest DOJ's Definition of “Foreign Official,” FCPA Update, Vol. 2, No. 9 (Apr. 2011).

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.