Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Co-Creator Sues for Accounting of Income from <i>Walking Dead</i> Television Series

By Amanda Bronstad
February 28, 2012

Comic book artist Tony Moore has sued Robert Kirkman, an executive producer of The Walking Dead TV series, claiming he was tricked into signing a 2005 agreement and has been denied an accounting to determine his share of the show's profits. Moore, whose full name is Michael Anthony Moore, claims in a suit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in February that Kirkman and his company, Kirkman LLC, have failed to provide books and records that would clarify how much Moore should be paid under the agreement. Moore v. Kirkman, BC478780.

“He's received some checks, but that's all he gets are checks,” says Moore's attorney, Devin McRae, a partner at Los Angeles-based Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae. “He's asked for accounting statements and access to the supporting documentation that is supposed to be provided under the agreement, and he's getting stonewalled.”

Kirkman's attorney, Allen Grodsky of Grodsky & Olecki in Santa Monica, CA, says Moore's claims of misconduct are unfounded. Moore was represented by “very competent counsel” when he signed the agreement, Grodsky says. “The idea he was duped into signing this is kind of ridiculous,” Grodsky adds. “And we believe that when discovery is done on this case, and people are looking at the documents, what we're going to show is he hasn't been underpaid at all. It's possible he's been overpaid.”

The Walking Dead, which premiered on AMC in 2010, is a post-apocalyptic show about a police officer who finds survivors in a world overrun by zombies. Originally a comic book, The Walking Dead is one of five comic book series or ideas that Moore co-created with Kirkman, according to the suit. As such, the two shared copyrights in the works.

In 2005, Kirkman told Moore that there was “a large deal on the table” for a television series based on The Walking Dead, but that it would not go through unless Moore gave up his copyright interests, according to the complaint. The agreement, among other things, gave Moore 60% of the net proceeds for The Walking Dead and another comic book series, Brit, and 20% of the net proceeds from movies or television programs made from The Walking Dead and Brit. The agreement, according to the suit, entitled Moore to “a statement of costs, expenses and indebtedness paid in connection with” the comic books and the right “to inspect the books and records” of Kirkman LLC.

Kirkman and his company have failed to provide those books and records, according to the complaint. Most recently, McRae says, Moore hired an auditor and sent a demand letter in December asking for books and records, but Kirkman and his company have not responded. “There have been promises and assurances by Robert and his handlers that information as forthcoming, but to date there's been none,” McRae says. “My client came to the conclusion that the only way he'll see these records is to file suit.”

The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages plus punitive damages on claims of promissory fraud and breach of written contract, and an accounting. 


Amanda Bronstad is a Staff Reporter for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance.

Comic book artist Tony Moore has sued Robert Kirkman, an executive producer of The Walking Dead TV series, claiming he was tricked into signing a 2005 agreement and has been denied an accounting to determine his share of the show's profits. Moore, whose full name is Michael Anthony Moore, claims in a suit filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in February that Kirkman and his company, Kirkman LLC, have failed to provide books and records that would clarify how much Moore should be paid under the agreement. Moore v. Kirkman, BC478780.

“He's received some checks, but that's all he gets are checks,” says Moore's attorney, Devin McRae, a partner at Los Angeles-based Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae. “He's asked for accounting statements and access to the supporting documentation that is supposed to be provided under the agreement, and he's getting stonewalled.”

Kirkman's attorney, Allen Grodsky of Grodsky & Olecki in Santa Monica, CA, says Moore's claims of misconduct are unfounded. Moore was represented by “very competent counsel” when he signed the agreement, Grodsky says. “The idea he was duped into signing this is kind of ridiculous,” Grodsky adds. “And we believe that when discovery is done on this case, and people are looking at the documents, what we're going to show is he hasn't been underpaid at all. It's possible he's been overpaid.”

The Walking Dead, which premiered on AMC in 2010, is a post-apocalyptic show about a police officer who finds survivors in a world overrun by zombies. Originally a comic book, The Walking Dead is one of five comic book series or ideas that Moore co-created with Kirkman, according to the suit. As such, the two shared copyrights in the works.

In 2005, Kirkman told Moore that there was “a large deal on the table” for a television series based on The Walking Dead, but that it would not go through unless Moore gave up his copyright interests, according to the complaint. The agreement, among other things, gave Moore 60% of the net proceeds for The Walking Dead and another comic book series, Brit, and 20% of the net proceeds from movies or television programs made from The Walking Dead and Brit. The agreement, according to the suit, entitled Moore to “a statement of costs, expenses and indebtedness paid in connection with” the comic books and the right “to inspect the books and records” of Kirkman LLC.

Kirkman and his company have failed to provide those books and records, according to the complaint. Most recently, McRae says, Moore hired an auditor and sent a demand letter in December asking for books and records, but Kirkman and his company have not responded. “There have been promises and assurances by Robert and his handlers that information as forthcoming, but to date there's been none,” McRae says. “My client came to the conclusion that the only way he'll see these records is to file suit.”

The suit seeks unspecified monetary damages plus punitive damages on claims of promissory fraud and breach of written contract, and an accounting. 


Amanda Bronstad is a Staff Reporter for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Entertainment Law & Finance.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.