Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since July 24, 2011, same-sex couples may legally marry in New York. (Marriage Equality Act (2011), www.governor.ny.gov/assets/marriageequalitybill.pdf.) While same-sex couples will now enjoy numerous benefits that were previously denied to them, a panoply of benefits provided by federal laws available to heterosexual married spouses continue to be unavailable to similarly situated same-sex married couples. This unequal treatment of legally married same-sex couples arose with the passage of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996 by the U.S. federal government. (Defense of Marriage Act, 1 U.S.C. ' 7 (1996).) The enactment of DOMA permitted the federal government only to recognize the legitimacy of heterosexual marriages. (28 U.S.C. ' 1738C.) In other words, discrimination against same-sex couples legally married has been codified by the federal government since 1996. (See article infra, p. 1.)
The federal government's non-recognition of same-sex couples has far-reaching effects. This article does not attempt to address all of the current inequalities, but rather focuses on specific federal tax advantages that are unavailable to legally married same-sex couples who subsequently divorce ' advantages that are unavailable solely due to the couple's sexual orientation. As a result, until DOMA is repealed, practitioners must continue to utilize the remedies previously developed for the dissolution of same-sex relationships (when marriage was unavailable to same-sex couples) to overcome the existing federally sanctioned discrimination.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.