Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bit Parts
Declaratory Copyright Complaint Can Be Amended After Plaintiff Film Company Secures Financing
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York allowed a film company to amend a declaratory action for copyright non-infringement, after the company secured financing for its production. Effie Film LLC (EFL) v. Murphy, 11 Civ. 783. EFL sought a declaratory ruling that actress/screenwriter Emma Thompson's screenplay Effie ' about a love triangle among historical art figures John Ruskin, Euphemia (Effie) Gray and John Everett Millais ' didn't infringe on Gregory Murphy's screenplay and playscript The Countess. Murphy moved to dismiss on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the film hadn't yet been produced. But after production of the film was completed, EFL moved to amend its complaint to reflect that. District Judge Thomas P. Griesa noted: “There is no indication that EFL acted in bad faith in pursuing this amendment. Rather, EFL reasonably seeks to update its complaint to reflect recent significant factual developments in an effort to cure what Murphy claims are jurisdictional defects. The court also is not persuaded that Murphy would be prejudiced by allowing EFL to amend its complaint. There has been no discovery in this case and Murphy may, of course, file any appropriate motions attacking the jurisdictional basis or merits of EFL's amended complaint.”
Sony/ATV Wins Right to Renewal Terms in Roger Miller Songs
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided that Sony/ATV Music was entitled to the copyright renewal terms for hits songs such as “King of the Road” and “Dang Me” that Roger Miller wrote in 1964. Roger Miller Music Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing LLC, 10-5363. Miller had signed songwriting agreements with Sony/ATV's predecessor Tree Publishing. Sony/ATV filed renewal applications with the U.S. Copyright Office in 1992, when Miller was still alive in the 27th year of the songs' initial 28-year copyright terms. But Miller didn't live until the start of the renewal terms in 1993. So Roger Miller Music ' to which his widow Mary Miller had assigned song rights she inherited through Roger's will ' claimed it owned the rights to the songs' renewal terms. However, the Sixth Circuit noted: “The renewal copyright vests in any party entitled to it 'at the time the application is made.' [17 U.S.C.] '304(a)(2)(B)(i). The author (and therefore any of his assignees [i.e., Sony/ATV) thus secures an interest in the renewal copyright so long as he is still living at the time of application for renewal with the Copyright Office. This interest is not lost even if the author subsequently dies prior to the commencement of the renewal term. The House Judiciary Committee Report for the 1992 [Copyright Renewal] Act confirms this reading '.” The appeals court added: “The fact that the interest in the renewal copyright vests “upon the beginning of such further term,” 17 U.S.C. '304(a)(2)(B)(i), does not dictate a contrary result. The date of vesting is not dispositive as to who owns the copyright '.”
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.
Declaratory Copyright Complaint Can Be Amended After Plaintiff Film Company Secures Financing
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Sony/ATV Wins Right to Renewal Terms in Roger Miller Songs
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided that Sony/ATV Music was entitled to the copyright renewal terms for hits songs such as “King of the Road” and “Dang Me” that Roger Miller wrote in 1964. Roger Miller Music Inc. v. Sony/ATV Publishing LLC, 10-5363. Miller had signed songwriting agreements with Sony/ATV's predecessor Tree Publishing. Sony/ATV filed renewal applications with the U.S. Copyright Office in 1992, when Miller was still alive in the 27th year of the songs' initial 28-year copyright terms. But Miller didn't live until the start of the renewal terms in 1993. So Roger Miller Music ' to which his widow Mary Miller had assigned song rights she inherited through Roger's will ' claimed it owned the rights to the songs' renewal terms. However, the Sixth Circuit noted: “The renewal copyright vests in any party entitled to it 'at the time the application is made.' [17 U.S.C.] '304(a)(2)(B)(i). The author (and therefore any of his assignees [i.e., Sony/ATV) thus secures an interest in the renewal copyright so long as he is still living at the time of application for renewal with the Copyright Office. This interest is not lost even if the author subsequently dies prior to the commencement of the renewal term. The House Judiciary Committee Report for the 1992 [Copyright Renewal] Act confirms this reading '.” The appeals court added: “The fact that the interest in the renewal copyright vests “upon the beginning of such further term,” 17 U.S.C. '304(a)(2)(B)(i), does not dictate a contrary result. The date of vesting is not dispositive as to who owns the copyright '.”
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?