Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 26, 2012

FLORIDA

Second Government FCA Settlement Brings Total Government Recoveries to $217.5 Million

On April 3, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a second False Claims Act (FCA) settlement ' totaling $137.5 million ' with Tampa, FL-based Wellcare Health Plans Inc. (Wellcare), arising from the government's criminal and civil investigation of Wellcare that commenced in 2006. The government's earlier Wellcare settlement, in the form of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement that included restitution and forfeiture commitments totaling $80 million, was concluded on May 5, 2009.

Specifically, the settlement announced on April 3 resolves four whistleblower lawsuits filed pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the FCA. The qui tam suits alleged multiple schemes involving Medicare and Medicaid, including retention of overpayments and falsification of data. According to the government's release, Wellcare provides managed health care services for roughly 2.6 million beneficiaries of these programs across the country.

As part of the settlement, the four whistleblowers ' referred to as “relators” under the FCA ' received $25.41 million of the settlement, with over 80% of that total allocated to a former Wellcare financial analyst, as the analyst's lawsuit triggered the government's investigation. The remainder of the settlement will be split among the United States and nine separate states.

In announcing the settlement, Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Civil Division, made the following comments: “Government health plans increasingly rely on managed care organizations to provide patient care. This case illustrates our commitment to ensur[ing] that government funds are in fact used to render care and not to line the pockets of those more concerned with the bottom line.”

Additionally, Robert E. O'Neill, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, had the following to say about the settlement: “The monies recovered in restitution and from this settlement agreement will go to the federal and state programs which suffered these losses, while the forfeited funds will go to law enforcement to help fund future investigations,” adding that “[i]n an era of decreasing federal and state budgets, and increasing healthcare costs, we must pursue all available civil remedies to recover losses suffered by government healthcare programs. This settlement should serve as notice to those defrauding state and federal healthcare programs that, in addition to appropriate criminal prosecutions, we will utilize civil suits to root out their conduct and recover their ill-gotten gains.”

FLORIDA

Second Government FCA Settlement Brings Total Government Recoveries to $217.5 Million

On April 3, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a second False Claims Act (FCA) settlement ' totaling $137.5 million ' with Tampa, FL-based Wellcare Health Plans Inc. (Wellcare), arising from the government's criminal and civil investigation of Wellcare that commenced in 2006. The government's earlier Wellcare settlement, in the form of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement that included restitution and forfeiture commitments totaling $80 million, was concluded on May 5, 2009.

Specifically, the settlement announced on April 3 resolves four whistleblower lawsuits filed pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the FCA. The qui tam suits alleged multiple schemes involving Medicare and Medicaid, including retention of overpayments and falsification of data. According to the government's release, Wellcare provides managed health care services for roughly 2.6 million beneficiaries of these programs across the country.

As part of the settlement, the four whistleblowers ' referred to as “relators” under the FCA ' received $25.41 million of the settlement, with over 80% of that total allocated to a former Wellcare financial analyst, as the analyst's lawsuit triggered the government's investigation. The remainder of the settlement will be split among the United States and nine separate states.

In announcing the settlement, Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department's Civil Division, made the following comments: “Government health plans increasingly rely on managed care organizations to provide patient care. This case illustrates our commitment to ensur[ing] that government funds are in fact used to render care and not to line the pockets of those more concerned with the bottom line.”

Additionally, Robert E. O'Neill, U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, had the following to say about the settlement: “The monies recovered in restitution and from this settlement agreement will go to the federal and state programs which suffered these losses, while the forfeited funds will go to law enforcement to help fund future investigations,” adding that “[i]n an era of decreasing federal and state budgets, and increasing healthcare costs, we must pursue all available civil remedies to recover losses suffered by government healthcare programs. This settlement should serve as notice to those defrauding state and federal healthcare programs that, in addition to appropriate criminal prosecutions, we will utilize civil suits to root out their conduct and recover their ill-gotten gains.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?