Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In our day-to-day lives, Americans recognize that the “list” or “sticker” prices for products or services do not always reflect their actual cost. But in the topsy-turvy world of the legal system, lawyers who represent plaintiffs in product liability and other personal injury cases seek damages for medical expenses based on amounts originally billed by healthcare providers that are significantly higher than the plaintiff – or anyone paying on her behalf – actually paid. In recent years, several states have limited or eliminated these “phantom damages.”
For example, more than three-quarters of Americans have “club cards” that they routinely use at the supermarket. When the customer presents the card and the store applies applicable discounts at the checkout counter, the total bill can easily come down 20% from the “regular” prices. If an individual purchased supplies for a work-related event at the supermarket, and submitted a request to her employer for reimbursement, she would not expect to receive a check reflecting the prices on the receipt prior to the deduction of discounts. Another illustration is the sticker price of a car. Car buyers recognize that the amount on the window of the vehicle is a starting point for negotiation, and that they ultimately pay less. Most states impose a sales tax on cars. A purchaser would not expect the state to base the amount of that tax on the sticker price of the car, but would anticipate paying an amount based on the actual cost. Obviously, in each case, consumers expect the transaction to be based on the amount actually paid, not a list price. They recognize that the sticker price may simply reflect the pricing practices of that industry, not the true cost.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.