Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most corporate counsel know that their D&O insurance may advance or reimburse defense costs, and settlements or judgments incurred in civil litigation naming their directors and officers (as well as the company if entity coverage is purchased). Depending upon policy terms, D&O insurance may also pay defense costs incurred in response to various Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) actions as well, including an informal investigation, a formal order of investigation, a subpoena or an indictment. Coverage varies widely depending upon the D&O policy terms. Any corporate counsel approached by the SEC must tread carefully, as hundreds of millions of dollars in coverage have been lost by major corporations facing SEC matters.
The following are some inquires and suggestions designed to help in-house counsel secure their rights under D&O policies in SEC matters and derive the greatest benefit from their premiums.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."