Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

First Circuit Hears Arguments in Suit over A&E Photo Use

By Sheri Qualters

In May 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit considered a photographer's case against television companies over alleged infringement of his image of a notorious imposter who called himself Clark Rockefeller. Donald Harney filed his lawsuit, Harney v. Sony Pictures Television Inc., 11-1760, in July 2010, alleging that Sony Pictures Television and A&E Television Networks infringed on his photo of Rockefeller and his daughter in the made-for-television movie Who Is Clark Rockefeller? Harney's photo depicted the father and daughter leaving a church in Boston's Beacon Hill neighborhood on Palm Sunday, March 31, 2007. The Beacon Hill Times published the photo in April 2007.

Rockefeller, a German man whose real name is Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter, was convicted in June 2009 in Massachusetts Superior Court of parental kidnapping of his daughter, Reigh, and assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. He was sentenced to a maximum of five years in state prison for both charges. In January 2012, a judge in Alhambra Superior Court in California ruled that Gerhartsreiter must stand trial for the murder of Jonathan Sohus. Sohus disappeared in 1985, at a time when Gerhartsreiter was renting a guesthouse at Sohus' mother's San Marino, CA, home under the name Christopher Chichester.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

When Is a Repair Structural or Nonstructural Under a Commercial Lease? Image

A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."