Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Imagine the following hypothetical (one most employers would agree constitutes a “nightmare scenario”), with apologies to “Back to the Future”: Your company, McFly Industries, which develops, manufactures and sells hoverboards, just celebrated its fifth anniversary after having its most successful year ever. In the highly competitive hoverboard industry, you have managed to beat the competition and grab a larger slice of the hoverboard market, surpassing your fiercest competitor, Biff Incorporated. This development is largely due to your company's development of the Flux Capacitor, which has given McFly Industries' hoverboard superiority over its rivals' boards, and allows it to reach top-end speeds (once clocked at 88 miles per hour in an unofficial test).
However, your elation is short-lived. Late on a Friday afternoon, you receive nearly identical e-mails from your top engineer, Doc, who was responsible for development of the Flux Capacitor, and Marty, your crack Sales Director, informing you they are resigning effective immediately. Then, over the weekend, you learn through industry sources that they are going to work for Biff, and may have been planning to go work for Biff Incorporated for some time. Even worse, on Monday your lawyer, Strickland, informs you that neither Doc nor Marty signed a non-competition or non-solicitation agreement, meaning they are free to compete against you virtually unfettered. You do some digging, and sure enough Marty and Doc have been sending e-mails to their personal e-mail accounts, which you suspect contain confidential McFly Industries information ' including files related to the Flux Capacitor ' that they will use to compete against you at Biff Incorporated.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.