Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
While the FDA has had a long-standing policy of permitting drug, biologics, and medical device companies to respond to unsolicited requests for information about off-label use of their products, there has been significant discussion over what constitutes “unsolicited” in this context. On July 5, 2011, seven medical products companies filed a “citizen petition” with the FDA, asking for clarification of several issues, including: 1) responses to unsolicited requests; 2) the meaning of scientific exchange; 3) the appropriate interactions with formulary committees, payors, and similar entities; and 4) the dissemination of third-party clinical practice guidelines. Although the Citizen Petition is pending, on Dec. 23, 2011, the FDA issued a draft guidance that addresses the first issue in the Petition. In the draft guidance titled “Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Information About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices,” the FDA describes how drug, biologics, and medical device manufacturers should respond to unsolicited requests for off-label information, including ' for the first time ' communications via the Internet and social media. (“Draft Guidance” is the FDA's proposed approach to compliance with a legal or regulatory requirement. When finalized, the draft guidance will represent the FDA's current thinking on this topic. Neither a draft nor final guidance creates or confers any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind the FDA or the public. A person can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.)
Overview of the Draft Guidance
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."