Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms generate an enormous amount of data and information that can bog down lawyers and prevent them from doing their jobs effectively. Most law firms now have some sort of digital data storage. But, transitioning to digital data storage, with or without parallel paper files, presents a new challenge: how to manage thousands of electronic documents saved on the firm's computers.
The fact that several software programs are used for different purposes further complicates this process. Microsoft Outlook could be used for e-mails and calendaring, for example, while Excel is used to track deadlines and manage case statuses. Information is often duplicated within different programs, making it tough to find the most recent information. The end result is that lawyers can't find documentation quickly, leading to more hours spent trying to find information and less time for getting substantive legal work done.
As the principal of Ocean Law, a firm specializing in patent, trademark and Internet law, I found it difficult to find the right files when I needed them. Many times, I would only find a desired file after searching folders in Windows Explorer. When this was happening far too often, I decided to implement electronic document management software to help order and manage the firm's files.
The Problem
I knew that Ocean Law needed to improve document management for each of our clients and cases. The range of data and documents was daunting. We used docketing software to manage deadlines for applications to various patent offices, and Word and Acrobat to create legal documents. Papers issued by U.S. and international patent offices needed to be filed for reference, and there was all the e-mail correspondence with clients. It was hard to find files that related to a particular case or client since information was spread within different folders and among different software programs.
Projects sometimes got delayed because information was not at my fingertips and documents had to be double-checked to ensure that they were the latest version on file. I found it challenging at times to retrieve inactive files quickly, which might be needed while speaking with a client on the phone. In this day and age, many of our clients have come to expect that we will use the best technology available to serve them. Meeting those expectations was a challenge.
At the time, I knew document management solutions existed for large law firms, but what we needed was a great solution for a small firm. I felt that with the right technology, the firm could become more productive while offering better service to our clients.
Considerations for Document Management Software
I knew something about electronic document management software from spending time in large law offices and reading about it in trade publications. While I knew this kind of software could benefit my practice, I intended to make sure some basic criteria were met:
DocPoint
After some Internet research, we found what looked to be a solution: DocPoint. The program was designed for small- to medium-sized businesses that want a simple solution for managing electronic documents. While the product's market is not limited to law firms, I found that its design worked for a business of our size. Like most law firms, our files are organized in a systematic way so they fit within DocPoint's method of placing all information into a single repository with a hierarchical file indexing structure.
No consultation was needed from our IT services, as DocPoint required no changes to our network other than loading the software. Instructions for using the program were explained through online tutorials on the DocPoint website. We also used DocPoint staff to help with any questions we had.
Existing files could be transferred into DocPoint so that they were in the same configuration as they were in Windows Explorer. We could also ensure that the same filing structure existed for every client and case. Before DocPoint, our filing structure was not automatically enforced which meant that documents were not filed consistently. With DocPoint, this problem is solved. DocPoint automatically sets up and enforces a uniform set of folders so there is no confusion about where files are stored no matter who is looking for them.
The program also allows users to add tags and connections so that all related documents are easily found regardless of document type, be it an e-mail, a spreadsheet or a calendar entry. Files could be readily moved across folders and multiple copies could be made within different folders. Scheduled meetings, task lists and e-mails in Outlook, for example, could be found together with scheduling and deadline lists in Excel.
DocPoint integrated into each program of Microsoft Office (e.g., Word, Excel and PowerPoint). These programs contain a DocPoint button in the toolbar. By clicking the “Add to DocPoint” button from the drop-down menu, we can file documents into pre-determined folders.
Immediately, documents could be found quickly and easily for any of the firm's clients and legal matters. There was no uncertainty about which draft was the latest version. We could find past documents that made useful starting points for documents needed in a similar case. And, if I need to get a document while on the phone with a client, it is readily available. By entering key words, it's possible to quickly find any document.
Conclusion
Document management software made a significant difference in making our practice more productive and efficient. The thousands of electronic documents saved on Ocean Law's computers are easily managed and accessible when required. We continue to use DocPoint to save time and be more efficient, allowing us to give our clients the best service possible.
Law firms generate an enormous amount of data and information that can bog down lawyers and prevent them from doing their jobs effectively. Most law firms now have some sort of digital data storage. But, transitioning to digital data storage, with or without parallel paper files, presents a new challenge: how to manage thousands of electronic documents saved on the firm's computers.
The fact that several software programs are used for different purposes further complicates this process.
As the principal of Ocean Law, a firm specializing in patent, trademark and Internet law, I found it difficult to find the right files when I needed them. Many times, I would only find a desired file after searching folders in Windows Explorer. When this was happening far too often, I decided to implement electronic document management software to help order and manage the firm's files.
The Problem
I knew that Ocean Law needed to improve document management for each of our clients and cases. The range of data and documents was daunting. We used docketing software to manage deadlines for applications to various patent offices, and Word and Acrobat to create legal documents. Papers issued by U.S. and international patent offices needed to be filed for reference, and there was all the e-mail correspondence with clients. It was hard to find files that related to a particular case or client since information was spread within different folders and among different software programs.
Projects sometimes got delayed because information was not at my fingertips and documents had to be double-checked to ensure that they were the latest version on file. I found it challenging at times to retrieve inactive files quickly, which might be needed while speaking with a client on the phone. In this day and age, many of our clients have come to expect that we will use the best technology available to serve them. Meeting those expectations was a challenge.
At the time, I knew document management solutions existed for large law firms, but what we needed was a great solution for a small firm. I felt that with the right technology, the firm could become more productive while offering better service to our clients.
Considerations for Document Management Software
I knew something about electronic document management software from spending time in large law offices and reading about it in trade publications. While I knew this kind of software could benefit my practice, I intended to make sure some basic criteria were met:
DocPoint
After some Internet research, we found what looked to be a solution: DocPoint. The program was designed for small- to medium-sized businesses that want a simple solution for managing electronic documents. While the product's market is not limited to law firms, I found that its design worked for a business of our size. Like most law firms, our files are organized in a systematic way so they fit within DocPoint's method of placing all information into a single repository with a hierarchical file indexing structure.
No consultation was needed from our IT services, as DocPoint required no changes to our network other than loading the software. Instructions for using the program were explained through online tutorials on the DocPoint website. We also used DocPoint staff to help with any questions we had.
Existing files could be transferred into DocPoint so that they were in the same configuration as they were in Windows Explorer. We could also ensure that the same filing structure existed for every client and case. Before DocPoint, our filing structure was not automatically enforced which meant that documents were not filed consistently. With DocPoint, this problem is solved. DocPoint automatically sets up and enforces a uniform set of folders so there is no confusion about where files are stored no matter who is looking for them.
The program also allows users to add tags and connections so that all related documents are easily found regardless of document type, be it an e-mail, a spreadsheet or a calendar entry. Files could be readily moved across folders and multiple copies could be made within different folders. Scheduled meetings, task lists and e-mails in Outlook, for example, could be found together with scheduling and deadline lists in Excel.
DocPoint integrated into each program of
Immediately, documents could be found quickly and easily for any of the firm's clients and legal matters. There was no uncertainty about which draft was the latest version. We could find past documents that made useful starting points for documents needed in a similar case. And, if I need to get a document while on the phone with a client, it is readily available. By entering key words, it's possible to quickly find any document.
Conclusion
Document management software made a significant difference in making our practice more productive and efficient. The thousands of electronic documents saved on Ocean Law's computers are easily managed and accessible when required. We continue to use DocPoint to save time and be more efficient, allowing us to give our clients the best service possible.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.