Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April 3, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided Peterson v. McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, 676 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2012), which held that bankruptcy trustees are not immune from the litigation defense known as “in pari delicto” ' the argument that if opposing parties in a lawsuit are equally in the wrong, then neither has a colorable claim against the other. See Schlueter v. Latek, — F.3d —, No. 11-3679, 2012 WL 2044362, at *4 (7th Cir. June 6, 2012). In so deciding, the Seventh Circuit brought itself into alignment with several other courts of appeals and severely limited the applicability of Scholes v. Lehmann, 56 F.3d 750 (7th Cir. 1995), perhaps the court's most cited decision addressing in pari delicto (and independently notable for its use of the term “evil zombies”). As the authors discuss in this article, Peterson is a critically important decision to bankruptcy lawyers, particularly those who prosecute and defend causes of action brought by bankruptcy estates and their representatives.
'In Pari Delicto'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.