Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When divorcing parties enter into a settlement agreement or when a court issues a decision distributing the parties' assets and awarding support, the expectation should be that the case is at an end and the parties will adhere to the results. Unfortunately, in these uncertain economic times, the role of attorney does not end with the entry of a divorce judgment. Attorneys are frequently faced with client requests to enforce their rights to receive the assets and/or support awarded in the judgment. For purposes of illustration in this article, we will assume the client is an “Ex-Wife” and the defaulting party is an “Ex-Husband.”
In determining the appropriate enforcement remedy to pursue, the attorney should try to assess why the Ex-Husband is in default and how best to collect for the Ex-Wife. The Ex-Husband's financial circumstances will affect the remedy the lawyer recommends. If money is tight, the best course may be to attempt to settle and minimize legal fees for all involved. However, if the Ex-Husband has assets and/or income and has willfully elected not to pay the Ex-Wife, there are a variety of remedies that can be applied.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.