Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Federal Circuit recently addressed whether it is proper to join multiple defendants within a single action for no other reason than each defendant is accused of infringing the same patent. In re EMC Corp., Misc. Dkt. No. 100 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2012) (Dyk J.). The case arose within the context of mandamus relief sought by eight defendants joined in the same patent case in the Eastern District of Texas, after the district court barred those defendants from severing or transferring their claims. The defendants' petition for a writ of mandamus was filed before enactment of the new non-joinder provision under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, Pub. L. No. 112-29, sec. 19(d), ' 299, 125 Stat. 284 (2011) (to be codified at 35 U.S.C. ' 299) (“AIA”). For this reason, the Federal Circuit expressly warned that its decision on the defendants' writ was not an interpretation of the AIA. Nevertheless, the court's reasoning in the course of granting the defendants' writ suggests that the Federal Circuit may have been foreshadowing how it will interpret the AIA's new non-joinder provision when faced with the opportunity in the future to do so.
Factual History
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.