Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Refining the Pleading Requirements for Patent Infringement

By Brad Riel
July 30, 2012

In a much anticipated decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in In Re Bill of Lading Transmission and Processing System Patent Litigation, No. 2010-1493, – 1494, -1495, -1496, 2011-1101, – 1102 (Fed. Cir. June 7, 2012) (O'Malley J.) has clarified the pleading requirements for alleging patent infringement. The court held that Form 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) governs the required specificity when pleading direct infringement. Thus, a plaintiff need not plead facts establishing that each element of an asserted claim is met, need not identify which claims it asserts are being infringed, and need not identify a specific direct infringer if it pleads facts sufficient to allow an inference that at least one direct infringer exists.

In contrast, Supreme Court decisions such as Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) ' not Form 18 ' rule when pleading indirect infringement. To state a claim for contributory infringement, a plaintiff must, among other things, plead facts that allow an inference that the components sold or offered for sale have no substantial non-infringing uses. Affirmatively pled facts that indicate substantial non-infringing uses may defeat a claim for contributory infringement.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.