Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 29, 2012

WASHINGTON, DC

FCPA Sting Case Witness Sentenced

On July 31, 2012, the government's cooperating witness in its widely publicized Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) sting was sentenced to 18 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, DC. (See details of the trial in the lead article in this issue.) Richard Bistrong, a former vice president for international sales at Armor Holdings (which was bought by BAE Systems PLC), had previously admitted to conspiring to bribe government officials to gain contracts for Armor Holdings, after the company initiated a voluntary disclosure of its activities to the government. Bistrong pled guilty to a single count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA in February 2009. After speaking with government prosecutors, Bistrong agreed to go undercover for nearly three years to, among other things, help the government build a case against military and police-equipment industry employees, as part of a sting operation where a federal agent posed as a representative of the West African nation of Gabon. Bistrong's “extraordinary cooperation” led to the government indicting 22 individuals in 2009; however, after three acquittals and two mistrials, the government dropped the charges against the remaining individuals earlier this year.

Despite the unsuccessful sting prosecutions, federal prosecutors argued to Judge Leon that Bistrong should receive probation, rather than jail time, as his extraordinary cooperation was vital to law enforcement and had led to other convictions in the U.S. and the UK. While Judge Leon recognized both the efforts of Bistrong and his reformation, he found that Bistrong had already benefitted via a plea to reduce charges.

WASHINGTON, DC

FCPA Sting Case Witness Sentenced

On July 31, 2012, the government's cooperating witness in its widely publicized Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) sting was sentenced to 18 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, DC. (See details of the trial in the lead article in this issue.) Richard Bistrong, a former vice president for international sales at Armor Holdings (which was bought by BAE Systems PLC), had previously admitted to conspiring to bribe government officials to gain contracts for Armor Holdings, after the company initiated a voluntary disclosure of its activities to the government. Bistrong pled guilty to a single count of conspiracy to violate the FCPA in February 2009. After speaking with government prosecutors, Bistrong agreed to go undercover for nearly three years to, among other things, help the government build a case against military and police-equipment industry employees, as part of a sting operation where a federal agent posed as a representative of the West African nation of Gabon. Bistrong's “extraordinary cooperation” led to the government indicting 22 individuals in 2009; however, after three acquittals and two mistrials, the government dropped the charges against the remaining individuals earlier this year.

Despite the unsuccessful sting prosecutions, federal prosecutors argued to Judge Leon that Bistrong should receive probation, rather than jail time, as his extraordinary cooperation was vital to law enforcement and had led to other convictions in the U.S. and the UK. While Judge Leon recognized both the efforts of Bistrong and his reformation, he found that Bistrong had already benefitted via a plea to reduce charges.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?