Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The recently published First Circuit opinion in Rosciti v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, 659 F.3d 92 (1st Cir. 2011), presents an increasingly common interplay between two somewhat different and often conflicting areas of law ' insurance coverage and bankruptcy. The conflict arises when the insured has a large self-insured retention or deductible that it is obligated to pay before the insurance coverage is triggered, but prior to the entry of a judgment or settlement the insured files bankruptcy and cannot pay that obligation. When the insured/debtor has a covered claim against it, the plaintiff and the insured want the insurer to provide coverage, and the insurer's position is that it has no duty to do so unless and until the insured satisfies its
initial payment obligations.
Facts
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.