Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Third Circuit Establishes Joint Employment Test

By Daniel V. Johns and Kelly T. Kindig

In late June, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered the broad definition of “employer” under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to determine when two employers jointly employ an employee, an issue that has been arising with increasing frequency as plaintiffs' lawyers seek to file sweeping collective actions encompassing parent corporations, subsidiaries, and affiliated entities.

The decision in In re Enterprise Rent-A-Car, No. 11-2883 (June 28 2012), announces a new test ' which the court dubbed “the Enterprise test” ' for determining joint employment under the FLSA. Drawing on its existing test for joint employment under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Ninth Circuit's FLSA joint employment test set forth in Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare Agency, the Third Circuit instructed lower courts to analyze the following factors when considering whether a joint employment relationship exists:

  • Authority to hire and fire.
  • Authority to promulgate work rules and assignments and set employees' conditions of employment (compensation, benefits, and work schedules, including the rate and method of payment).
  • Involvement in day-to-day employee supervision, including employee discipline.
  • Actual control of employee records, such as payroll, insurance, or taxes.

A Balanced Approach

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.