Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Counsel Concerns
The New York Supreme Court, New York County, ruled that the statute of frauds did not bar a lawyer's claim for payment commissions for representing a TV personality under an oral retainer agreement to negotiate future-season TV episodes work. Kastner v. MacLean, 100379/2011. New Jersey attorney Drew Kastner sought a 15% commission from New York-based personality Malcolm MacLean. In defense, MacLean and his companies raised N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law (GOL) '5-701, which in part prohibits enforcing agreements that can't be performed within one year. But County Supreme Court Justice Lucy Billings noted in an unpublished opinion: “While the statute of frauds would bar plaintiff's claims seeking compensation for negotiating a business opportunity, as the statute of frauds applies to implied or express contracts, ' GOL '5-701(a)(10) specifically exempts from its application 'a contract implied in fact or in law ' to pay compensation to ' an attorney at law.'” Meanwhile, Judge Todd J. Campbell of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, has permitted attorney Chad Etheridge to intervene in litigation in which plaintiff James Martinez sued country artist Tim McGraw and others for song copyright infringement. Etheridge charges that Martinez hired him as counsel but then fired the lawyer without cause. Judge Campbell further decided, however, that resolution of Etheridge's claims against Martinez for breach of contract and related causes of action must be stayed “until the underlying litigation is completed.” Martinez v. McGraw, 3-08-0738.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.