Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Huge Settlement in Misbranding Case
Federal District Court Judge Samuel Wilson on Oct. 1 imposed a massive fine on Abbott Laboratories for marketing its drug, Depakote, for uses never approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For promoting Depakote as a treatment for schizophrenia and as means of controlling undesirable behavior in dementia patients, the drug manufacturer was ordered to pay a fine of $500 million, to forfeit nearly $200 million, and to pay the Virginia Medicaid Fraud Control Unit $1.5 million. These amounts are in addition to the $800 million the company has already pledged to pay the federal government and a number of states to resolve claims that Depakote's fraudulent marketing caused false claims to be filed with those entities. According to the U.S. Department of Justice for the Western District of Virginia, which announced the judgment, this is the second-largest criminal fine of all time for the misbranding of a single drug.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.