Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Third-party litigation financing is a booming form of finance that seems like a natural fit for bankruptcy-related litigation initiated by Chapter 7 trustees, and official committees of unsecured creditors and debtors. Although the disclosure requirements of the bankruptcy code may give the most secretive funds pause, these issues can be managed and should not be a barrier to most participants. Ultimately, third-party litigation finance will assist in the efficient, comprehensive liquidation of bankruptcy estates and provide the maximum benefit for creditors.
This type of litigation finance is an alternative asset class that has experienced rapid growth in the U.S. in the past decade. Explained in its its simplest form, a third party provides capital to a claimant to cover or supplement the cost of litigating a claim or to hedge against an adverse outcome. The third party purchases a portion of a claimant's recovery, less attorneys' fees and costs. The financing is almost always provided on a non-recourse basis, i.e., the claimant is not liable to the third party if the underlying lawsuit is unsuccessful.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.