Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

'Buckyballs' Lawsuit May Limit Use of Celebrity Name

By Kyle-Beth Hilfer

“Buckyballs” magnetic toys have been in the news because of the manufacturer's public battle with the Consumer Products Safety Commission (“CPSC”). This past summer, the CPSC sought to ban the sale of the magnetic balls in the United States because of their misuse and threat to children who ingest the toy. Recently, the manufacturer Maxfield & Oberton Holdings, LLC faced another legal setback. In November 2012, a California federal district court denied its motion to dismiss the lawsuit of the Estate of Buckminster Fuller. If the Estate eventually prevails, the emerging precedent could strengthen the rights of a celebrity trying to protect use of his personal name.

The plaintiff in the case of The Estate of Buckminster Fuller v. Maxfield & Oberton Holdings, LLC, U.S. District Court Northern District of California, San Jose Division, Case No.: 5:12-CV-02570-LHK, 11/05/12 Order denying motion to dismiss, is the successor in interest to the rights of Richard Buckminster Fuller, the famous scientist who discovered the Carbon-50 molecule named after him as “Buckminsterfullerene” or “Buckyball.” Plaintiff controls rights to several variations of Fuller's name, including “Bucky Fuller.” The Defendant manufactures and sells the popular desk toy named “Buckyballs” and several other toys that incorporate the “Bucky” prefix, such as “Buckycubes” and “BuckyBlocks.” Throughout Defendant's literature, it refers to Fuller and his discovery. In 2011, Plaintiff had granted Defendant a limited license to use Fuller's name and likeness in connection with a specific limited edition of its “Buckyball” toy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.